How to send your papers...Send your papers now!The Editorial Board
 


Antheridial Development from the Isolated Protoplast of Young Gametophyte of Tree Fern Cyathea contaminans (Hook) Copel.: A Scientific Approach to Teaching about Spermatogenesis

Classroom Psychosocial Environment

 

VOLUME 8    2008

 

VOLUME 7    2007

 

VOLUME 6    2006

 

VOLUME 5    2005

 

VOLUME 4    2004

 

VOLUME 3    2003

 

VOLUME 2    2002

 

VOLUME 1    2001

 


Copyright © 2001 NISMED.
For comments/suggestions, email the webmaster.

The Development and Validation of a Classroom Environment Scale for Filipinos

Thelma C. Rivera
Pharmaceutical Chemistry 
Department
College of Pharmacy
University of the Philippines 
Manila 
PHILIPPINES 1101

thelma@kulog.upm.edu.ph

Mildred F. Ganaden
College of Education
University of the Philippines Diliman 
PHILIPPINES 1101

msgana@ced.upd.edu.ph

 

AbstractIntroductionDescription of the LESConstruction of the LES
Validation of the LESReliability of the LESThe Factor Analysis
Summary
ReferencesAppendices

 

Field Testing of the LES

From November 11, 1996 through January 14, 1997, the LES was field tested on a total random sample of 720 high school chemistry students (10 students per class and approximately equal number of boys and girls) from randomly selected 72 classes (6 classes per school) in 12 randomly chosen big schools in Quezon City.

Instead of tediously writing the Filipino translations of some English words in the LES not easily understood by high school students on the board as was done during the prepilot and pilot-testing phases of research, the respondents were provided with a mimeographed copy of a list of these words with their corresponding Filipino translations (Appendix D).

The respondents were pulled out from their chemistry class in order not to disrupt the entire class. They were pulled out one class at a time. However, in some schools, the respondents from the six classes were excused by the science head teacher so they could all take the tests at the same time during the day and the researcher did not have to go back many times to the same school. The tests were given in a vacant classroom, library or conference room in the absence of the teacher/s to put the respondents at ease. And as was done during the prepilot and pilot stages, the answered forms were placed in a brown envelope, which was labeled with the name of the teacher, subject and section, and date.

It took some 25 minutes for the respondents to complete the LES.

The results were promptly encoded and analyzed statistically using the SPSS/PC + software. Of the 720 sets of students' responses, nine (9) were invalidated, reducing the total number of cases to 711.

 

AbstractIntroductionDescription of the LESConstruction of the LES
Validation of the LESReliability of the LESThe Factor Analysis
Summary
ReferencesAppendices