Establishing
Conceptual Bases for the Measurement of Volume
Copyright
© 2003 NISMED.
For comments/suggestions, email the webmaster.
Profiling
Teachers:
Constructivist- and Behaviorist-Oriented Mathematics
Boris
Handal
The University of Sydney
borishandal@optusnet.com.au
AbstractIntroductionThe
StudyMethodology
Results
and DiscussionConclusion
References
Andrews,
P., & Hatch, G. (1999). A new look at secondary teachers’
conceptions of mathematics and its teaching. British Educational
Research Journal, 25(2), 203–223.
Anderson,
J. (1997). Teachers’ reported use of problem solving teaching strategies
in primary mathematics classrooms. In F. Biddulph & K. Carr (Eds.), People
in mathematics education. Proceedings of the 20th Annual
Conference of the Mathematics Research Group of
Australian
Education Council (1991). A national statement on mathematics for
Australian schools. Melbourne: Curriculum Corporation.
Benbow,
R. M. (1993). Tracing mathematical beliefs of preservice teachers through
integrated content-methods courses. Proceedings of the Annual Conference
of the American Educational Research Association. (ERIC document ED 388
638.)
Biggs,
J., & Moore, P. (1993). The process of learning.
Prentice Hall.
Board
of Studies New South Wales. (1996). Mathematics Standard Course: Years 9-10. Sydney: Author.
Buzeika,
A. (1996). Teachers’ beliefs and practice: The chicken or the egg? In
P.C. Clarkson (Ed.), Technology in mathematics education. Proceedings
of the 19th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group
of
Clements,
D., & Battista, M. (1990). Constructivist learning and teaching. Arithmetic
Teacher, 38 (1), 34–35.
Cooksey,
R. W. (1984). A descriptive outline of statistical methods. Armidale,
NSW: UNE.
Disadvantaged
Schools Program NSW. (
Elliot,
S. N., Kratochwill, J., & Travers, J. F. (1996). Educational
psychology: Effective teaching, effective learning. Dubuque:
Brown and Benchmark Publishers.
Frank,
M. L. (1990). What myths about mathematics are held and conveyed by
teachers? Arithmetic Teacher, 37(5), 10–12.
Freeman,
C., & Sokoloff, H. J. (1995). Children learn to make a better world:
Exploring themes. Childhood Education, 73, 17–22.
Frykholm,
J. A. (1995). The impact of the NCTM Standards on preservice
teachers’ beliefs and practices. (ERIC document ED 383 669.)
Graetz,
B. (1995). Socioeconomic status in education research and policy. (1995).
In J. Ainley, B. Graetz, M. Long, & M. Batten (Eds),
Socioeconomic status and school education. Canberra:
Australian Government Publishing Service.
Hall,
G. E., & Hord, S. M. (1987). Change in schools: Facilitating the
process. NY:
Handal,
B. (2000). Teaching in themes: Is that easy?
Reflections, 25(3), 48–49.
Handal,
B. (2001), Teachers’ mathematical beliefs and practices in teaching
and learning thematically: The 1996 Standard course. Unpublished
doctoral dissertation, Sydney
Handal,
B. (2002). Teachers’ beliefs and gender, faculty position, teaching
socio-economic area, teaching experience and academic qualifications.
Proceedings of the 2002 International Biannual Conference of the UWS Self
Research Centre (pp. 1–6),
Handal,
B., Bobis, J., & Grimison, L. (2001). Teachers' mathematical beliefs
and practices in teaching and learning thematically.
In J. Bobis, B. Perry, & M. Mitchelmore (Eds.), Numeracy and
beyond. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the
Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Inc (pp. 265–272),
Sydney: MERGA.
Kifer,
E., & Robitaille, D. F. (1992). Attitudes, preferences and opinions.
In D. F. Robitaille
& R. A. Garden (Eds.), The IEA study of Mathematics II:
Contexts and outcomes of school mathematics (pp. 178–208). NY:
Pergamon.
Leder,
G. C. (1994). Research in mathematics education—constraints on
construction?. In G. Bell (Ed.), Challenges in mathematics education:
Constraints on construction. Proceedings of the 17th Annual
Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of
Marland,
P. W. (1994). Teaching: Implicit theories. In T. Husen & T. N.
Postlewaite (Eds.-in-chief), The international encyclopaedia of
education (pp. 6178–6183). NY: Pergamon.
McGinnis,
J. R., Shama, G., Graeber, A., & Watanabe, T. (1997). Development
of an instrument to measure teacher candidates’ attitudes and beliefs
about the nature of and the teaching of Mathematics and Sciences.
Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the National Association for
Research in Science Teaching, Oak Brook,
Minichiello,
V., Aroni, R., Timewell, E., & Alexander, L. (1990). In-depth
interviewing: Researching people. Melbourn:
Longman Cheshire.
Murphy,
E. (1997). Characteristics of constructivist learning and teaching.
National
Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for
the teaching of mathematics. Reston
: NCTM.
Howard,
P., Perry, B., & Lindsay, M. (1997). Secondary mathematics teachers’
beliefs about the learning and teaching of mathematics. In F. Biddulph
& K. Carr (Eds.), People in mathematics education. Proceedings
of the 20th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education
Research Group of
Perry,
B., Howard, P., & Tracey, D. (1999). Head mathematics teachers’
beliefs about the learning and teaching of Mathematics. Mathematics
Education Research. Journal, 11, 39–57.
Peterson,
P. L., Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P, & Loef, M. (1989). Teachers’
pedagogical content beliefs in mathematics. Cognition and Instruction,
6(1), 1–40.
Phillip,
D. C. (1995). The good, the bad, and the ugly. The many faces of
constructivism. Educational Researcher, 24(7), 5–12.
Seely,
A. (1995). Integrated thematic units. Westminter,
Stein,
M., Silbert., & Carnine, D. (1997). Designing effective mathematics
instruction: A direct approach. NJ: Prentice Hall.
Thompson,
A. G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of
research. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics
teaching and learning (pp. 127–146). NY: Macmillan.
Wood,
T., Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1991). Change in teaching mathematics. American
Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 587–616.
Zambo, R. (1994). Beliefs
and practices in mathematics problem solving
Proceedings of the
Annual Conference of the School Science and Mathematics Association, Fresno, CA. (ERIC
document
ED 375 006.)
AbstractIntroductionThe
StudyMethodology
Results
and DiscussionConclusion